Skip to main content

Type

Any

Year of Publication

2022, 2017, 2009

Type

Any

Year of Publication

2022, 2017, 2009
Working Safely with Hydrogen
Author(s)
MSA Safety Company
The adoption of hydrogen (H²) as a clean, zero-carbon renewable energy source promises a global revolution, eliminating harmful emissions responsible for climate change. This white paper explores the opportunities and implications of an emerging hydrogen society. MSA Safety examines workplace safety risks and challenges posed when producing, handling, transporting, and storing alongside suggested best practices, safety measures, and detection technologies.
Blast Wave Generated by Delayed Ignition of Under-Expanded Hydrogen Free Jet at Ambient and Cryogenic Temperatures
Author(s)
Donatella Cirrone
Dmitriy Makarov
Andreas Friedrich
Joachim Grune
Keiji Takeno
An under-expanded hydrogen jet from high-pressure equipment or storage tank is a potential incident scenario. Experiments demonstrated that the delayed ignition of a highly turbulent under-expanded hydrogen jet generates a blast wave able to harm people and damage property. There is a need for engineering tools to predict the pressure effects during such incidents to define hazard distances. The similitude analysis is applied to build a correlation using available experimental data.
Hydrogen Production, Storage, Distribution and Use
Author(s)
Christopher A. Cavanagh, PE
Contents 1 Climate Change Policy Objective 2 Hydrogen Flexibility 3 Hydrogen Production and Sources4 Hydrogen Properties5 Hydrogen Safety Codes and Standards Overview6 UK Hydrogen Blending Demo Approval7 US Hydrogen Blending Concept8 Pipeline Integrity9 Gas Composition Standards10 Pipeline Standards11 Hydrogen Safety Utilization 12 Conclusion 
Stockimage_gradient
Hydrogen Incident Recovery Guide
Author(s)
Hydrogen Safety Panel
This document applies to the recovery phase of a typical emergency management framework that includes planning, response, mitigation, and recovery. This document provides practical guidance with a checklist to help an organization recover from a hydrogen incident and return to normal operations after the event scene has been stabilized and returned to the organization by the incident commander. This document does not include activities related to the immediate emergency response and initial investigations performed by other entities.
gradient background
Ammonia and hydrogen represent opposite ends of the spectrum with regard to the potential blast loading resulting from an accidental vapor cloud explosion (VCE), although many in industry have expressed doubts as to whether either of these fuels actually pose a VCE hazard. Ammonia is some-times discounted as a VCE hazard due to the perceived difficulty in igniting an ammonia-air mixture and/or because of its low laminar burning velocity. Hydrogen is sometimes discounted as a VCE hazard due to the ease with which a hydrogen-air mixture can be ignited and/or because of its buoy-ancy.
Stockimage_gradient
The purpose of this guide is to assist users of codes and standards that apply to hydrogen application and use in understanding and applying the approval, certification, listing, and labeling provisions of the codes and standards, in any application where the required certification, listing, and labeling of services, methods, or equipment has not yet been established or achieved.  
Stockimage_gradient
2017 Annual Progress Report
Author(s)
Hydrogen Safety Panel
VIII.6  Hydrogen Safety Panel, Safety Knowledge Tools and First Responder Training Resources
The broad use of hydrogen as an energy carrier to tackle the issue of climate change is unavoidable. The emerging hydrogen economy poses new problems to be solved to ensure a level of safety in hydrogen technologies and infrastructure comparable to that for today’s fossil fuels. The pressure of onboard hydrogen storage in early-market
Stockimage_gradient
Secondary Protection for 70 MPa Fueling 
Author(s)
Hydrogen Safety Panel
In developing a 70 megapascal (MPa) fueling infrastructure, it is critical to ensure that a vehicle equipped with a lower service pressure fuel tank is never filled from a 70 MPa fueling source. Filling of a lower service pressure vehicle at a 70 MPa fueling source is likely to result in a catastrophic event with severe injuries or fatalities. The Hydrogen Safety Panel recommends that DOE undertake a two‐step process to address this issue.
Disclaimer- The documents and references herein are for information purposes only and should not be construed as endorsement by the Hydrogen Safety Panel.
We are professional and reliable provider since we offer customers the most powerful and beautiful themes. Besides, we always catch the latest technology and adapt to follow world’s new trends to deliver the best themes to the market.

Contact info

We are the leaders in the building industries and factories. We're word wide. We never give up on the challenges.

Recent Posts